About Me

Name: David Andrews
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 

TSA Inspection of Troops Coming Home

A war buddy of mine emailed this to me about how our TSA conducts inspections on troops returning from the combat zone in Afghanistan.  This is to good not to pass along to all.
 
David D. Andrews Sr., SMSgt, USAF (ret.)
 

This from one of our heroes coming home from defending our freedom..

As the Chalk Leader for my flight home from Afghanistan , I witnessed the following:

When we were on our way back from Afghanistan , we flew out of Baghram Air Field. We went through customs at BAF, full body scanners (no groping), had all of our bags searched, the whole nine yards. Our first stop was Shannon , Ireland to refuel. After that, we had to stop at Indianapolis , Indiana to drop off about 100 folks from the Indiana National Guard. That's where the stupid started.

First, everyone was forced to get off the plane-even though the plane wasn't refueling again. All 330 people got off that plane, rather than let the 100 people from the ING get off. We were filed from the plane to a holding area. No vending machines, no means of escape. Only a male/female latrine.

It's probably important to mention that we were ALL carrying weapons. Everyone was carrying an M4 Carbine (rifle) and some, like me, were also carrying an M9 pistol. Oh, and our gunners had M-240B machine guns. Of course, the weapons weren't loaded. And we had been cleared of all ammo well before we even got to customs at Baghram, then AGAIN at customs.    

The TSA personnel at the airport seriously considered making us unload all of the baggage from the SECURE cargo hold to have it reinspected. Keep in mind, this cargo had been unpacked, inspected piece by piece by U.S. Customs officials, resealed and had bomb-sniffing dogs give it a one-hour run through. After two hours of sitting in this holding area, the TSA decided not to reinspect our Cargo-just to inspect us again: Soldiers on the way home from war, who had already been inspected, reinspected and kept in a SECURE holding area for 2 hours. Ok, whatever. So we lined up to go through security AGAIN.

This is probably another good time to remind you all that all of us were carrying actual assault rifles, and some of us were also carrying pistols.

So we're in line, going through one at a time. One of our Soldiers had his Gerber multi-tool. TSA confiscated it. Kind of ridiculous, but it gets better. A few minutes later, a guy empties his pockets and has a pair of nail clippers. Nail clippers. TSA informs the Soldier that they're going to confiscate his nail clippers. The conversation went something like this:

TSA Guy: You can't take those on the plane.

Soldier: What? I've had them since we left country.

TSA Guy: You're not supposed to have them.

Soldier: Why?

TSA Guy: They can be used as a weapon.

Soldier: [touches butt stock of the rifle] But this actually is a weapon. And I'm allowed to take it on.

TSA Guy: Yeah but you can't use it to take over the plane. You don't have bullets.

Soldier: And I can take over the plane with nail clippers?

TSA Guy: [awkward silence]

Me: Dude, just give him your damn nail clippers so we can get out of here. I'll buy you a new set.

Soldier: [hands nail clippers to TSA guy, makes it through security]

To top it off, the TSA   demanded we all be swabbed for "explosive residue" detection. Everyone failed, [go figure, we just came home from a war zone], because we tested positive for "Gun Powder Residue". Who the hell is hiring these people?

This might be a good time to remind everyone that approximately 233 people re-boarded that plane with assault rifles, pistols, and machine guns-but nothing that could have been used as a weapon.

Can someone please tell me What happened to OUR country while we were gone?

Sgt. Mad Dog Tracy

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Who are Veterans?

Most everyone would know a veteran is the person who raises their right hand promising to defend the United States Constitution against foreign and domestic foes.  I have to agree.  Even though that makes every solder, sailor, marine, and guard a veteran, I believe most are overlooking the other “veterans.”  These are the parents, wives, husbands, grandparents and children of the veteran.  In my first four years as an enlisted member in the United States Air Force, I was deployed overseas on 90 day TDYs (temporary duty assignments) twice a year.  I was in a C-130 aircraft flying wing.  My new bride had to stay behind and somehow cope with being a new bride away from her parents as a nineteen year old in a strange city.  Later in my career, she had to worry about me going off to the desert in the first Gulf war not knowing if her husband was safe and hoping a blue staff car with military officers wearing their blue suits do not pull up in the drive way.  When I got home from the war she confided in me that she would watch the late news trying to get a glimpse of me on a video clip and when I never turned up on the news she would cry her heart out, most nights.

 

Yes, I am a United States Veteran but my dear wife of almost 33 years is also a veteran and she has paid her dues in tears, in worries, in raising our kids when I was away.  So Thursday, if you see a veteran, thank him or her……… and thank his spouse too.

 

 

 

David D. Andrews Sr., SMSgt, USAF (ret.)

Tags: veteran  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

This is Joe Heflin TX HD-85

On September, 14, 2009, I announced my candidacy to represent Texans in the Texas House of Representatives from District 85. In the March Republican Primary, I was not successful and my opponent, Mr. Jim Landtroop, from Plainview, received a majority of the votes from our party. I wish Mr. Landtroop much success in the November General Election.

During my campaign in 2009, I received a letter from a citizen from Stonewall County voicing his displeasure with current District 85 representative Joe Heflin on how he voted in the 81st Texas Legislative session on House Bill 2063 when the residents of Aspermont asked Mr. Helfin to help them to fight off a lawsuit that could bankrupt the City of Aspermont. This bill was brought about due to a lawsuit brought on the City of Aspermont by the Rolling Plains Water District. This lawsuit is about water that is pumped from Haskell County to Stonewall County from property that is owned by the City of Aspermont (see http://www.11thcoa.courts.state.tx.us/opinions/HTMLOpinion.asp?OpinionID=8979 ).

Here is the text of the letter, not dated; I received from this resident of Stonewall County in October 2009:

 Joe:

I’m totally confused about how you helped us with the legislation on the H.B. 4212, H.B. 4218, and the H.B. 2063.

I called you around the first of April and advised you of these bills. You stated that you would check on this for us. Around the first of May, you called me and advised that you had gotten all bills killed, before they reached the floor. I advised my colleagues of the great action you had taken on this matter for us.

Not one word has been heard from you on this matter since that time. On June 2, 2009 we were advised that H.B. 2063 has passed the Senate and the House and is waiting the Governors signature. You voted on it at least twice and you had no objections to this bill. The Rolling Plains water district people do not vote for you, as a State Representative. We the people in Stonewall County do. Yet you voted against us and did not defend us on the water district bill.

You voted against us. The “little guy” doesn’t carry much weight - - - Does he??

I truly had the good feeling that we had a State Representative to represent rural America. I am very disappointed in you. I feel that you deceived me and lied to me, which is normal for a politician.

Advise me if we need to print this in all the area newspapers in your voting district. Do you believe that the people that you represent should be aware of your actions? If you would like to explain how you have helped us in this matter, we would like to hear from you.

Sincerely,

H.B. 4212 - http://www.legis.state.tx.us/billlookup/History.aspx?LegSess=81R&Bill=HB4212

H.B. 4218 - http://www.legis.state.tx.us/BillLookup/history.aspx?LegSess=81R&Bill=HB4218

H.B. 2063 - http://www.legis.state.tx.us/BillLookup/history.aspx?LegSess=81R&Bill=HB2063

As you can see, Mr. Heflin said he would help his constituents and then buckled to “Big Interest” and threw one of the 16 counties he is supposed to help and defend under the bus for his personal gain. He supported a water district that could potentially bankrupt the City of Aspermont in Stonewall County if the Texas Supreme Court decides this case in favor of a Water District that is not even in District 85.

This is the man that we want to represent us in District 85? To fight for us in rural Texas? If Mr. Heflin can do this to Stonewall County then he could do this to any of the 16 counties of District 85.

Just thought the voters of Texas District 85 should know this.

David D. Andrews Sr.  

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

TX HD-85 JOE HEFLIN'S Voting Record

 

I have identified key votes cast or not cast by the present District 85 Representative, Mr. Heflin, in the last legislative session regarding conservative issues. These votes can be verified in the Texas House Journal at http://www.journals.house.state.tx.us/hjrnl/home.htm

Some information has been extracted from Texas Eagle Forum and Texans for Fiscal Responsibility.

HCR 50 - Would have affirmed that the State of Texas is sovereign under the Tenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution over all powers not otherwise enumerated and granted to the federal government by the U.S. Constitution, serving notice to the federal government to cease and desist certain mandates, and provided that certain federal legislation be prohibited or repealed. – Failed to cast a vote (Unexcused Absence) even though he answered the roll call in the House.

HB 1935 – Establishes and funds a “green jobs” skills training program. Creating an unscientific category for “green jobs” estimated to cost taxpayers more than $17 MILLION. – Voted Yes.

HB 3983 - Requires the Comptroller to conduct a study of a “circuit breaker program” to limit property taxes based on the property owner’s annual income; property taxation based on your income, rather than on your property value. – Voted Yes.

HJR 77 - A Constitutional Amendment to replace authority of the ELECTED State Board of Education with an UNELECTED new Permanent School Fund Management Council, thus removing the only constitutional authority the SBOE has to exist. – Voted Yes.

HJR 112 - A Constitutional Amendment to allow county commissioners with voter approval to raise property taxes $.05 per $100 valuation. – Voted Yes.

HB 130  - Entitlement to expand half-day pre-kindergarten to full-day pre-kindergarten, although studies prove that such programs do not enhance academic achievement beyond the 2nd grade; “nanny state” policy. – Voted Yes.

HCR 220  - Would have created an interim committee to study the economic impact of gambling in TX. The gambling industry is known for embellishing its potential impact in order to sell its vice. – Voted Yes.

HB 489 - Would have given counties and cities the authority to remove graffiti from private property at the owner’s expense; a blatant infringement on property rights and the fact that there was no recourse if damage was incurred. – Voted Yes.

HB 498 - Establishes an “innocence commission” to “study” convictions in a court of law; undermining juries and the judicial system. – Voted Yes.

HB 2888 - Would use federal tax dollars for a “Free File” program to prepare federal income tax returns for those who receive rental assistance and live in housing developments; a taxpayer-funded “Free File” program for those who probably don’t pay taxes and the only reason they file is to receive the Earned Income Tax Credit. – Voted Yes.

HB 1299 - Would have required the Texas Lottery Commission to operate an instant-ticket lottery game. Many who spend money to play the lottery is those that can least afford the expense. – Voted Yes.

****HB 1937 - Would allow city governments to assess and impose energy efficient improvements to be paid through property taxes and allowed a lien to be placed against the homeowner’s lot; the left-wing Democrats wanted to impose expensive and unscientific radical environmentalism on Texans. – Voted Yes.

**** Would force Tax Payers to comply with a government mandate to purchase products; does this sound like what OBAMACARE will mandate on every American to purchase Healthcare???????????
 
As you can see, Mr. Heflin is no conservative because Conservatives do not MANDATE anything which is unconstitutional to begin with.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

This is TX HD-85 Joe Heflin

 
 

On September, 14, 2009, I announced my candidacy to represent Texans in the Texas House of Representatives from District 85. In the March Republican Primary, I was not successful and my opponent, Mr. Jim Landtroop, from Plainview, received a majority of the votes from our party. I wish Mr. Landtroop much success in the November General Election.

During my campaign in 2009, I received a letter from a citizen from Stonewall County voicing his displeasure with current District 85 representative Joe Heflin on how he voted in the 81st Texas Legislative session on House Bill 2063 when the residents of Aspermont asked Mr. Helfin to help them to fight off a lawsuit that could bankrupt the City of Aspermont. This bill was brought about due to a lawsuit brought on the City of Aspermont by the Rolling Plains Water District. This lawsuit is about water that is pumped from Haskell County to Stonewall County from property that is owned by the City of Aspermont (see http://www.11thcoa.courts.state.tx.us/opinions/HTMLOpinion.asp?OpinionID=8979 ).

Here is the text of the letter, not dated; I received from this resident of Stonewall County in October 2009:

 Joe:

I’m totally confused about how you helped us with the legislation on the H.B. 4212, H.B. 4218, and the H.B. 2063.

I called you around the first of April and advised you of these bills. You stated that you would check on this for us. Around the first of May, you called me and advised that you had gotten all bills killed, before they reached the floor. I advised my colleagues of the great action you had taken on this matter for us.

Not one word has been heard from you on this matter since that time. On June 2, 2009 we were advised that H.B. 2063 has passed the Senate and the House and is waiting the Governors signature. You voted on it at least twice and you had no objections to this bill. The Rolling Plains water district people do not vote for you, as a State Representative. We the people in Stonewall County do. Yet you voted against us and did not defend us on the water district bill.

You voted against us. The “little guy” doesn’t carry much weight - - - Does he??

I truly had the good feeling that we had a State Representative to represent rural America. I am very disappointed in you. I feel that you deceived me and lied to me, which is normal for a politician.

Advise me if we need to print this in all the area newspapers in your voting district. Do you believe that the people that you represent should be aware of your actions? If you would like to explain how you have helped us in this matter, we would like to hear from you.

Sincerely,

H.B. 4212 - http://www.legis.state.tx.us/billlookup/History.aspx?LegSess=81R&Bill=HB4212

H.B. 4218 - http://www.legis.state.tx.us/BillLookup/history.aspx?LegSess=81R&Bill=HB4218

H.B. 2063 - http://www.legis.state.tx.us/BillLookup/history.aspx?LegSess=81R&Bill=HB2063

As you can see, Mr. Heflin said he would help his constituents and then buckled to “Big Interest” and threw one of the 16 counties he is supposed to help and defend under the bus for his personal gain. He supported a water district that could potentially bankrupt the City of Aspermont in Stonewall County if the Texas Supreme Court decides this case in favor of a Water District that is not even in District 85.

This is the man that we want to represent us in District 85? To fight for us in rural Texas? If Mr. Heflin can do this to Stonewall County then he could do this to any of the 16 counties of District 85.

Just thought the voters of Texas District 85 should know this.

David D. Andrews Sr.  

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Voter ID in Texas Town Hall Meetings

At a town hall meeting in Texas, Representative Gene Green, D-Houston, decided to have people show identification cards to attend his town hall meeting.  In past Texas Legislative sessions, Rep Green voted against voter identification bills and during this legislative session he would not support SB 362 either if it came before a House floor vote.  This type of hypocrisy is exactly why I have decided to run for House District 85 in the 2010 election.  The Democrats in their state convention in Austin in 2008, required their delegates to the convention to show identification before they would be allowed to caucus.  However, when it comes to the general election, local election or any type of election where we, as voters, exercise our right to choose those that we want to represent our views, no voter identification is necessary.  Is this not the pinnacle of hypocrisy.  Texans deserve Voter Identification, Texans want Voter Identification, I want Voter Identification
David D. Andrews Sr. 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Voter ID

In May 2007, the Texas Senate tried to get HB 218 to a floor vote for
passage.  HB 218 was a bill that required a Texas voter to present a valid
ID card with a photograph when that person wanted to cast a ballot in an
election.  The bill was an attempt to combat voter fraud in Texas elections.
The bill was defeated by the Democrats in the Texas Senate where it died
when the Texas Senate adjourned.

Earlier this month the Democrats held their state convention in Austin.  It
is ironic that Democratic delegates to their own state convention had to
produce a valid photo identification card to get their credentials for the
floor and caucuses.  Was this procedure put in place to assure only elected
delegates from their county conventions attended?

It would appear the Democrats wanted their convention fraud-free from
unauthorized attendees but when it comes down to a general election by Texas
voters the same standards to assure a fraud-free election does not apply.



David D. Andrews Sr.
Merkel, Texas

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Voter Fraud in Texas

 

Voter Fraud in Texas is alive and well. Here are some numbers as published by the Texas Conservative Coalition http://www.txccri.org .

In 2007, a former Port Lavaca city councilwoman was convicted for assisting non-citizens in registering to vote.

Since 1992, Harris County has cancelled 3,742 registered voters because they were not citizens; 683 of those non-citizenship cancellations have occurred in the past seven years.

Between 2003 and 2005, 303 people were removed from the voter rolls in Bexar County because they were not citizens. Forty-one of these non-citizens voted in local, state, and federal elections.

From September 1999 to March 21, 2007, Dallas County cancelled the voter registration of 1,889 individuals because of non-citizenship. Before being deleted from the voter rolls, 356 of those individuals had voted in Dallas County.

In El Paso County, 213 non-citizens were removed from the voter rolls between January and October 2006.

In Tarrant County, 584 non-citizens have been removed from the voter rolls since 1999.

At least 6,731 non-citizens have registered to vote in Texas, and at least 391 non-citizens have illegally voted.

In 2007, the State Auditor identified 49,049 registered voters who may be ineligible to vote, including 23,114 possible felons and 23,576 who may be deceased.

In Texas, the legal system selects its jury members from the Texas Department of Public Safety (Drivers License) and the voter rolls. When a jury notice is sent to people who have registered to vote or who have driver’s license and those people go before the judge to be excused because they are not citizens then they are identified as being illegal aliens.

Some races in local communities are won or lost by the narrowest of margins. As you can see, Voter Fraud is indeed a real issue in Texas and other states.

David D. Andrews Sr.

Merkel, Texas 

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Energy Independence is Under our Feet

 

It is amazing what you can find on the DNC web site regarding “Energy Independence.” Here is a cut and paste from the web site:

Energy independence is something that both sides talk about, but it's an issue where the old Republican Congress simply failed to lead. Now the Democratic Congress is taking up the issue, offering bold ideas to reduce our nation's dependence on oil by significantly reducing our oil consumption.

This week, the Senate begins debating legislation to "increase the fuel economy of cars and trucks and boosting the use of non-petroleum fuels like ethanol." According to ABC News, the legislation currently being considered would:

  • Require that vehicles get 35 miles on the gallon by 2020. This would increase by 4 percent every year.
  • Authorize the Energy Department "to make loan guarantees for fuel-efficient vehicle manufacturers and related parts suppliers."
  • Increase the use of renewable fuels to 8.5 billion gallons in 2008, and to 36 billion gallons by 2022.
  • Give the federal government "more authority to go after oil companies that manipulate gasoline supplies and overcharge consumers at the pump."

I am not a geologists, I am just a simple accountant with, in my opinion, a good sense of “Good Ole Common Sense.” The majority of nations in the world are Energy Dependant on Middle East Oil. So how does one become Energy Independent? Well, no pun intended, if you have oil in your nation then go after the oil. The United States has enough oil in the ground – Alaska, Gulf of Mexico, Atlantic and Pacific Coasts and Texas still has a whole-lotta-oil left. Securing this oil would make us Energy Independent. But it is a finite resource. 

Let’s say we do reach the moment of Energy Independence. Then and only then can we aggressively require vehicles that get 35 miles per gallon. We can make those loans for fuel-efficient vehicle manufactures and increase renewable fuel usage.

It does not make a bit of sense to have a goal of Energy Independence from Middle East oil when we have the required amount of oil within our reach and under our feet and in the United States.

The Democrats idea of leadership is to have the American people continue to pay a high price at the pump hoping in 10 to 20 years the vehicle manufactures will make a car capable of 35 miles per gallon and everyone buys one. Also, the Democrats want you to wait until the technology to develop renewable fuels to 36 billion gallons by 2022.

OUR ENERGY INDEPENDENCE IS WAITING UNDER OUR FEET!!!!!!!!!  

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Voter Photo ID Card & Credit Cards

 

Today’s decision by the Supreme Court of the United States regarding the constitutionality of mandating voters to show a valid state or federal ID photo when going to the polls is a win for the American people. The number one right for all Americans is the right to vote and have a representative type government of the people and its will. Opponents against the requirement of a photo ID card did not like the court’s opinion that voter integrity is key to a free election and reduces voter fraud. Americans can be assured that when a vote is cast in the states that require a photo ID a free and fair election is being held. The argument that the poor and elderly will be left out of the voting process is misguided. Anyone can obtain an acceptable photo ID in any state at a nominal charge. People who drive an automobile already have a photo ID. Those that do not drive can get an Identification Card issued by the state.

If anyone has a beef about Identification is people who have credit cards. More fraud is associated with credit cards than with a voting election. But the credit card companies do not care about credit card fraud because they pass the loss to the credit card consumer in the form of interest rates. Businesses that accept credit cards also pay a fee for the transactions when the credit card holder makes a purchase. When credit card fraud occurs the business gets paid but the credit card holder gets their money back. The bank that underwrites the credit card is stuck with the charge but the bank just passes the loss to the credit card holders in the form of fees and interest charges. So in essence, credit card holders get burnt even if it was not your card that was used fraudulently. An easy fix to reduce credit card abuse in most transactions is to have a photo of the card holder on the credit card. The convenience store clerk can look at the picture before he processes the card and if the picture shows an attractive blonde with baby-blue eyes and the person passing the card is an over-weight non-shaven and brown eye person with an Adams apple then the store clerk may ask for a second ID…………..Hmmmm, it’s not rocket science on this one.

David D. Andrews Sr.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Who are Veterans?

  Most everyone would know a veteran is the person who raises their right hand promising to defend the United States Constitution against foreign and domestic foes.  I have to agree.  Even though that makes every solder, sailor, marine, and guard a veteran, I believe most are overlooking the other “veterans.”  These are the parents, wives, husbands, grandparents and children of the veteran.  In my first four years as an enlisted member in the United States Air Force, I was deployed overseas on 90 day TDYs (temporary duty assignments) twice a year.  I was in a C-130 aircraft flying wing.  My new bride had to stay behind and somehow cope with being a new bride away from her parents as a nineteen year old in a strange city.  Later in my career, she had to worry about me going off to the desert in the first Gulf war not knowing if her husband was safe and hoping a blue staff car with military officers wearing their blue suits do not pull up in the drive way.  When I got home from the war she confided in me that she would watch the late news trying to get a glimpse of me on a video clip and when I never turned up on the news she would cry her heart out, most nights.

 

Yes, I am a United States Veteran but my dear wife of almost 33 years is also a veteran and she has paid her dues in tears, in worries, in raising our kids when I was away.  So Sunday, if you see a veteran, thank him or her……… and thank his spouse too.

 

 

 

David D. Andrews Sr., SMSgt, USAF (ret.)

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »